Thursday, December 21, 2017

You Are Not Allowed To Speak The Truth On Guns In America



This is just incredible to me. This is an op-ed in the Washington Post by Dean L. Winslow, a retired Air Force colonel and flight surgeon, is a professor of medicine at Stanford University.  The article is titled:


I spoke my mind on guns. Then my Senate confirmation was put on hold.

So, what did Dr. Winslow say that caused John McCain to interrupt him?

As stated in his op-ed: "Then, I blurted out what was in my heart: “I’d also like to . . . just say how insane it is that in the United States of America a civilian can go out and buy a semiautomatic weapon like an AR-15.” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) interrupted, warning this was not in my “area of responsibility or expertise.” Soon after, my confirmation was put on hold."

Dr. Winslow knows what he is talking about:

"I am a marksman, rated expert in both the M-9 pistol and the M-16 rifle (the fully automatic military version of the AR-15). During one of my tours in Iraq, I spent hours with my Special Operations forces colleagues who were training Iraqi teams on our base, firing an array of military weapons. Using a powerful gun at a firing range is a real blast, and I support civilians experiencing that thrill at licensed ranges.
However, as commander of an Air Force hospital in Baghdad during the surge, I have seen what these weapons do to human beings. The injuries are devastating. In addition, because of their high muzzle velocities, assault weapons are challenging for untrained civilians to control and are not optimal for home defense. A pump-action 12-gauge shotgun, with its excellent stopping power, would be far better. Even with imperfect aim, a shotgun will hit its target, while the pellets won’t go through a wall to endanger someone in the next room. Assault rifles are also poor hunting weapons due to low accuracy beyond 100 yards."
 He nails the issue with the United States here:
"But with a standard 30-round magazine, assault rifles are perfect for mass murder. From 1995 to 2004, assault weapons were severely restricted in the United States. During that time, mass shootings were far less frequent — 1.6 compared with 4.2 per yearafter the ban lapsed in 2005. The experience in Australia is even more dramatic: No mass shootings have occurred there since assault weapons were outlawed in 1996. Assault weapons in the United States are not being used to kill “bad guys” in self-defense or to provide for a “well-regulated militia” but for entertainment, mass murder and domestic terrorism. Is this really the intent of the Second Amendment?"
I have relatives who love to hunt and I am perfectly fine with that.  NONE of them hunt with a anything more than a shotgun or a rifle.
Too bad our politicians are more concerned about not upsetting the NRA then they are with common sense....